Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 31.9% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.2% | 60.0% |
Mean | 61.9% | 67.1% |
Median | 65.2% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.5% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.7% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |