Ottawa vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Ottawa
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ottawa
Chickasaw
63.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,420 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 63.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 50.0% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 89.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.2% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 66.2% | 67.1% |
| Median | 65.7% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.7% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.2% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Belgium (63.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Lumbee (63.1%, a difference of 0.070%), West Indian (63.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (63.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |