Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,738,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 7.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.7% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 49.0% | 42.5% |
Range | 46.2% | 36.8% |
Mean | 18.2% | 18.7% |
Median | 16.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |