Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Uruguayans
Chickasaw
64.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
67.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,759,449 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 64.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.090%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 37.5% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 82.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.8% | 60.0% |
Mean | 65.2% | 67.1% |
Median | 65.8% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.5% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.7% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Austrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Swedish (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |