Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,036,504 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 67.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 4.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 45.7% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.3% | 60.0% |
Mean | 70.6% | 67.1% |
Median | 70.9% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.5% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Peru (67.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (67.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Thai (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |