Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,193 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 32.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.16% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 28.4% | 29.7% |
Range | 28.2% | 28.2% |
Mean | 7.4% | 12.1% |
Median | 6.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |