Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,716,618 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 51.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.6% | 60.0% |
Mean | 68.4% | 67.1% |
Median | 67.1% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.1% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.7% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |