South American vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
South American
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South Americans
Chickasaw
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,649,007 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 44.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.6% | 60.0% |
Mean | 69.3% | 67.1% |
Median | 69.1% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.3% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |