Immigrants from Indonesia vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Chickasaw
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,720,751 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 42.7% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 85.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.7% | 60.0% |
Mean | 69.1% | 67.1% |
Median | 69.3% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.4% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.3% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |