Chinese vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chinese
Chickasaw
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 5.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 47.5% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.1% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 68.6% | 67.1% |
| Median | 69.4% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.6% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |