Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 43.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.16% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 21.2% |
Range | 17.0% | 18.8% |
Mean | 4.1% | 7.4% |
Median | 3.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |