Nigerian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Nigerians
Chickasaw
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,466,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.85%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 85.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.1% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 67.1% |
| Median | 66.9% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.4% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |