Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,016,991 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 41.2% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.8% | 60.0% |
Mean | 68.4% | 67.1% |
Median | 67.1% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.0% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |