South American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South American Indians
Chickasaw
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.35%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 42.9% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 88.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.9% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 69.0% | 67.1% |
| Median | 70.3% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.6% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), German (64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |