Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 26.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 20.7% | 38.6% |
| Range | 19.1% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 18.1% |
| Median | 9.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |