Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chickasaw
71.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,145,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016 and weighted average of 71.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 10.5%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 37.6% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 90.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.8% | 60.0% |
Mean | 68.5% | 67.1% |
Median | 69.3% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.6% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.1% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Yup'ik (72.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Tongan (69.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Yakama (69.3%, a difference of 2.7%), Yuman (69.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Mexico (69.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Yup'ik | 100 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 72.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 71.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 69.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |