Chippewa vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Iroquois
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,830,906 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Iroquois.
Chippewa vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,104, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,374, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $42,430, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.78%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Good 6.5% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chippewa vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |