Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Iroquois
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,601,704 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Iroquois.
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $83,682, a difference of 43.1%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $74,279, a difference of 41.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $87,255, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $47,380, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $53,737, a difference of 28.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 61.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 28.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 54.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.2%), family households (64.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 93.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 82.1%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 65.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |