Romanian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Iroquois
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,986,838 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 58.8 Iroquois.
Romanian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $87,255, a difference of 24.5%), per capita income ($48,445 compared to $39,104, a difference of 23.9%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $74,279, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $36,408, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.71%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.9%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Romanian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Iroquois |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |