South African vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
South African
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South Africans
Iroquois
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in South African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,368,459 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.392% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 392.0 Iroquois.
South African vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $39,104, a difference of 28.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $87,255, a difference of 25.8%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $74,279, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $36,408, a difference of 14.9%).
Income Metric | South African | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,044 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $113,229 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,379 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,752 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,460 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,825 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,383 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,160 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,719 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,652 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
South African vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | South African | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
South African vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | South African | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
South African vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | South African | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
South African vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | South African | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 38.2% |
South African vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South African | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
South African vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.5%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | South African | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
South African vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%).
Disability Metric | South African | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |