Chinese vs South American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
South American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
South American Indians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South American Indian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,112,622 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 43.4 South American Indians.
Chinese vs South American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,215, a difference of 24.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $101,171, a difference of 14.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,446, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,019, a difference of 3.6%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,952, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,206, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Good $44,206 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Good $103,624 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Excellent $87,446 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Good $46,952 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Average $54,508 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,019 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Excellent $52,979 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Good $96,497 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Good $101,171 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $62,215 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.2%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 11.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Average 11.9% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Good 82.9% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Average 31.7% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 6.3% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Good 60.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Excellent 39.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Excellent 15.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chinese vs South American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | South American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Good 23.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |