Chinese vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,480,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $49,152, a difference of 57.6%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $84,981, a difference of 36.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,301, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,655, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,942, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 97.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 93.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.3%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.66%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%).