Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Lithuania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Lithuania
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,058,847 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,087, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,361, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,346, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,336, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,053, a difference of 1.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,836, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $51,361 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $118,053 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $96,836 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $52,769 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $63,346 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $43,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $55,028 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $108,149 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $114,336 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $66,087 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.6% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 25.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.93%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 56.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Good 55.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 52.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 44.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 44.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |