Chinese vs Slovene Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Slovene
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Slovenes
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,224
SOCIAL INDEX
79.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
81st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slovene Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,628,079 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Slovenes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Slovenes.
Chinese vs Slovene Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,241, a difference of 28.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $85,562, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,886, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,145, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,581, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,995, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Excellent $45,581 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $106,020 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Average $85,562 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Excellent $47,995 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,145 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Average $39,817 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,886 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Good $96,439 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Good $102,885 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Fair $60,241 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.3% |
Chinese vs Slovene Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 3.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Chinese vs Slovene Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese vs Slovene Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 43.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Chinese vs Slovene Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 62.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 25.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Excellent 47.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.07 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Good 31.2% |
Chinese vs Slovene Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 6.3% |
Chinese vs Slovene Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Excellent 60.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Excellent 47.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 39.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Good 1.9% |
Chinese vs Slovene Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Slovene |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |