Chinese vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,470,019 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.286% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 286.1 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $48,535, a difference of 59.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $82,513, a difference of 40.8%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $83,319, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,414, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,757, a difference of 14.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,119, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 101.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 101.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 100.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 62.2%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 138.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 99.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 97.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.75%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.0%).