Chinese vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,634,100 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 60.2%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $50,747, a difference of 52.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $85,552, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,932, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,538, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,596, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 99.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 96.8%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 90.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 60.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 52.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.9%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 355.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 223.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 162.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 46.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 109.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 162.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 67.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%).