Chinese vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,529,283 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.800. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.431% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 430.5 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,975, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $96,086, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $82,560, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,997, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,945, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 57.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.1%).