Chinese vs Immigrants from Greece Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,290,476 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Greece. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Immigrants from Greece.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,636, a difference of 19.9%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,891, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,689, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.97%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $117,344, a difference of 0.99%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,675, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.9%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 75.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.3%).