Chinese vs Somali Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Somali
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Somalis
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,155
SOCIAL INDEX
29.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
231st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Somali Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,208,398 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Somalis within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.670% in Somalis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 669.6 Somalis.
Chinese vs Somali Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,004, a difference of 43.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $88,600, a difference of 31.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,782, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,333, a difference of 8.2%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,567, a difference of 12.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $40,367, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Somali |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $40,367 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $94,085 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $75,782 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $43,567 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $49,025 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $38,333 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $48,657 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $83,752 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $88,600 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $54,004 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Chinese vs Somali Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 78.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 76.4%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.1%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 32.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Somali |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 25.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 21.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Chinese vs Somali Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Somali |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chinese vs Somali Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Somali |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 45.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 87.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chinese vs Somali Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.6%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Somali |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 57.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 41.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Good 30.7% |
Chinese vs Somali Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Somali |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Poor 89.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 51.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Chinese vs Somali Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 0.82%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Somali |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Poor 92.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Good 59.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 46.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Average 38.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.7% |
Chinese vs Somali Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Somali communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Somali |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.5% |