Chinese vs Cypriot Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Cypriot
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Cypriots
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cypriot Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,844,862 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Cypriots.
Chinese vs Cypriot Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $54,899, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,549, a difference of 15.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,589, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,496 compared to $102,843, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $123,396, a difference of 6.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $54,899 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $127,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $102,843 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $54,589 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $65,549 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $45,570 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Average $52,209 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $116,364 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $123,396 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $71,714 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Excellent 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.59%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.42%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 90.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 84.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 50.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 16.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 55.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 49.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 72.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 67.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 56.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chinese vs Cypriot Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Cypriot |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 43.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Excellent 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |