Chinese vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,028,713 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.280% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 280.4 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,321, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,951, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $91,087, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,626, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,492, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 84.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 72.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.5%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.2%), family households (68.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 130.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.18%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).