Armenian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,074,733 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 27.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 22.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 19.0% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 12.7% |
| Median | 7.4% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |