Immigrants from Zaire vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Chickasaw
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,226,893 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 33.3% |
Range | 14.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 9.9% | 12.7% |
Median | 10.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |