Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Chickasaw
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,316,077 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 52.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 44.9% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 12.7% |
| Median | 5.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |