Palestinian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Chickasaw
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,211,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 30.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.67% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 33.3% |
Range | 20.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 8.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.9% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |