Armenian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 43.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 18.8% | 35.8% |
Median | 16.5% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |