Armenian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,692,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 22.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 20.1% | 33.0% |
Range | 16.9% | 30.8% |
Mean | 10.6% | 15.0% |
Median | 9.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |