Pima vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 69.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.2% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.3% |
Range | 92.8% | 29.7% |
Mean | 29.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 23.3% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |