Armenian vs Icelander Family Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Icelander
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Icelanders
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Icelander Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,074,733 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,459,929 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Icelander |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 22.0% | 55.4% |
Range | 19.0% | 54.6% |
Mean | 8.2% | 10.9% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Icelanders by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |