Slovene vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Chickasaw
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,812,664 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 43.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 18.3% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 12.7% |
| Median | 6.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |