Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Chickasaw
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,339,413 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 40.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 23.4% | 33.3% |
Range | 21.0% | 29.7% |
Mean | 7.8% | 12.7% |
Median | 6.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Sweden (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Indian (Asian) (7.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Asian (7.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |