Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chickasaw
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,298,755 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 22.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.78% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 33.3% |
Range | 22.0% | 29.7% |
Mean | 8.9% | 12.7% |
Median | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |