British vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
British
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
British
Chickasaw
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,449,567 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 36.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 61.1% | 33.3% |
| Range | 58.4% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 12.7% |
| Median | 10.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to British by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Slovak (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Poland (7.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |