Armenian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,746,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Armenians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 72.5% | 54.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.5% | 45.4% |
Mean | 85.1% | 80.6% |
Median | 84.9% | 79.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.7% | 73.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.8% | 85.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Armenians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Australian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kuwait (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Asian (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Egyptians | 94.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 94.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |