Immigrants from Russia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Chickasaw
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,005,908 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 31.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 21.6% | 33.3% |
Range | 19.6% | 29.7% |
Mean | 8.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.19%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |