Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Chickasaw
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,580,330 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 41.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.89% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 33.3% |
Range | 16.8% | 29.7% |
Mean | 6.6% | 12.7% |
Median | 6.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |