South American vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
South American
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
South Americans
Chickasaw
46.1%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
23.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,081,354 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 46.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 37.0% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 68.4% |
Range | 34.9% | 40.9% |
Mean | 47.0% | 48.9% |
Median | 46.1% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.1% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Nepal (46.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (46.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (46.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (46.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from France (46.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |
Choctaw | 29.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.3% |
Immigrants | France | 27.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.2% |
Soviet Union | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 25.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 46.2% |
South Americans | 23.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 46.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 46.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 46.1% |