South American vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Chickasaw
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Chickasaw
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,269,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 14.8% | 17.6% |
| Range | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.8% |
| Median | 5.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Subsaharan African (5.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Moroccan (5.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
| South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |