South American vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
South American
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
South Americans
Chickasaw
12.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
16.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,814,121 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 5.4%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 32.8% |
| Range | 24.7% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 11.9% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Potawatomi (12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Uruguay (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and Colombian (12.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Armenia (13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Albania (13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants (13.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and Bermudan (13.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 17.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 12.4% |
| South Americans | 16.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 12.4% |
| Potawatomi | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 12.9 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.5% |
| Colombians | 10.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 8.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Moroccans | 7.6 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 7.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |