Inupiat vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Chickasaw
13.0%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,329,518 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 16.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 37.5% | 56.8% |
| Range | 33.0% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 22.9% |
| Median | 13.5% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Nonimmigrants (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Micronesia (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Pennsylvania German (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Marshallese (12.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Yaqui (12.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 12.8% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.0% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |